Allahabad High Court
CRLP/9721/2025 of SMT RASHMI TYAGI AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 6 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9721 of 2025 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J. 1. Case called out in the revised list. 2. Even though the names of Mr. Babit Kumar and Mr. Atmaram Nadiwal are duly published in the cause list as
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9721 of 2025
Court No. - 47
HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J.
HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Case called out in the revised list.
2. Even though the names of Mr. Babit Kumar and Mr. Atmaram Nadiwal are duly published in the cause list as counsel for the petitioners, but neither they nor anyone on their behalf is present to press the present writ petition, even in revised call.
3. Learned A.G.A. representing State-respondents 1, 2 and 3 is present.
4. Perused the record.
5. On the matter being taken up, learned AGA representing State respondents submits that after completion of statutory investigation of concerned case crime number arising out of the impugned FIR, investigating officer has submitted the charge sheet/police report dated 24.05.2025 in terms of Section 173
(2) Cr.P.C. Since a period of more than one year and four months has expired from the date of submission of charge sheet, cognizance upon same must have been taken by the jurisdictional Magistrate.
6. In view of above, we are of the view that by efflux of time this writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Atmaram Nadiwal, Babit Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Smt Rashmi Tyagi And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
7. It is accordingly dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
8. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. October 7,
AKT CRLP No. 9721 of 2025
(Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad