Allahabad High Court

WRIC/37653/2026 of SWETA AGRAWAL Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 37653 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard Sri Manoj Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ankit Prakash, learned counsel for the respondent- RERA. 2. By means of this petition filed under

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 37653 of 2026

Court No. - 1

HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.

HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Sri Manoj Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ankit Prakash, learned counsel for the respondent- RERA.

2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for following relief:- "i. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No. 3, U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Officer, Gautam Budh Nagar, Court No.- 3 to decide the complaint i.e. Complaint No.- NCR144/02/113987/ 2024 dated (Shweta Agrawal v. Rudra Buildwell Homes Private Limited), U/s. 31 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, pending before him, expeditiously if possible within a stipulated period of time, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."

3. Learned counsel for the respondent - RERA has no objection in the event direction is issued to the respondent No.- 3 to dispose of the pending complaint of the petitioner in accordance with law and in a time bound period period as may be prescribed by this Court.

4. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.- 3 to dispose of the pending complaint of the petitioner of the petitioner in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four months from the date of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Mishra, Manoj Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ankit Prakash, C.S.C., Mohd. Afzal Sweta Agrawal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)

production of certified copy of this order. October 7, 2026 IrfanUddin WRIC No. 37653 of 2026 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- IRFAN UDDIN SIDDIKI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead