Allahabad High Court

CRLP/23633/2026 of AMAN SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23633 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main reliefs:- "(1). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23633 of 2026

Court No. - 48

HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.

HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main reliefs:- "(1). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned FIR dated 04.09.2026 in Case Crime No. 229 of 2026 under Section 103 (1), 61 (2) of BNS at Police Station Gadwar, District Ballia. (2). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondent nos. 2 & 3 not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of the impugned FIR dated 04.09.2026 in Case Crime No. 229 of 2026 under Section 103 (1), 61 (2) of BNS at Police Station Gadwar, District Ballia."

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, after some length of arguments, without pressing the matter on merits prayed for leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy available under the law, as advised.

3. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State-respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merits, but has not objected the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners for granting leave to withdraw the instant writ petition.

4. Taking into consideration the submissions and prayer made by learned Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pavan Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Aman Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and no objection made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents, leave granted.

5. Without entering into merits of the case, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. October 7, 2026 C. MANI CRLP No. 23633 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead