Allahabad High Court
CRLP/23495/2026 of GANESH TIWARI AND 3 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 6 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23495 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23495 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned First Information Report dated 13.06.2026 having Case Crime No. 220 of 2026, under Section 115(2), 352, 351(2), 191(2), 191(3), 109 of BNS 2023, P.S.-Manjhanpur, District-Kaushambi.
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent authorities not to effect arrest of the Petitioners in Case Crime No. 220 of 2026, under Section 115(2), 352, 351(2), 191(2), 191(3), 109 of BNS 2023, P.S.-Manjhanpur, District-Kaushambi."
2. Learned A.G.A. has submitted that after completion of investigation, police report against the petitioners has been forwarded to the court concerned on 17.08.2026.
3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in the light of the statement given by learned A.G.A.
4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, and learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State-respondents Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajneesh Kumar, Sangam Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Ganesh Tiwari And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
and perused the material on record.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that police report has already been forwarded, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication.
6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed. October 7, 2026 Saurabh CRLP No. 23495 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad