Allahabad High Court

NA529/5008/2026 of MEENU RAI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 5008 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. 2. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 5008 of 2026

Court No. - 82

HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record.

2. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the court concerned for early disposal of S.T. No. 1170 of 2025 (State Vs. Pawan Rai @ Rahul Rai and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 637 of 2024, under Sections- 115(2), 352, 3(5), 105, 61(2) BNS, Police Station- Kotwali, District- Azamgarh, pending before the court of Addl. Sessions Judge, Court No.3), Azamgarh.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is lady and widow of the deceased of the case. The trial of the case is pending since 01.03.2025 before the court concerned and considerable time has already been lapsed. The accused persons are not co-operating with the proceedings and on 16.1.2026 they filed discharge application, which is still pending.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned to decide the aforesaid case in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of one year from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order, without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to either of the parties, if there is no other legal impediment. October 7, 2026 KK Patel Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Meenu Rai .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHN KANT PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead