Allahabad High Court

NA529/4850/2026 of MO HUSAIN Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4850 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4850 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the court concerned to expedite the hearing of Case No. 924 of 2024 (State vs. Shahnawaj and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 454 of 2023, under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act and 3/4 of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019, Police Station Handia, District Prayagraj, pending before the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 8, Prayagraj, expeditiously within stipulated period. It is submitted that the present FIR was lodged on 05.08.2023. Charge sheet was submitted on 13.12.2023, whereupon cognizance has been taken on 9.5.2024. It is submitted that more than two years lapsed, even though though the charges have also been framed, but the trial has yet not commenced. It is further submitted that the aforesaid case has remained pending before the learned court concerned since long time. Looking to the aforesaid circumstances, it is directed that trial pending before the concerned court be concluded expeditiously, as early as possible, in accordance law, without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to either of the parties, if there is no legal impediment. The application is disposed of. October 7, 2026/Brijesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pradeep Kumar, Prakash Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Mo Husain .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead