Allahabad High Court
CRLP/22823/2026 of VANSHU @ VANSH @ VASU Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 6 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22823 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main reliefs:- "(1). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22823 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main reliefs:- "(1). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned FIR dated 14.08.2026 in Case Crime No. 571 of 2026 under Sections 109 (1), 352, 351 (3), 3(5) of BNS, Police Station Sardhana, District Meerut. (2). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent nos.2 & 3 not to adopt any coercive method against the petitioner including arrest of minor petitioner in pursuance of impugned FIR dated 14.08.2026 in Case Crime No. 571 of 2026 under Sections 109 (1), 352, 351 (3), 3(5) of BNS, Police Station Sardhana, District Meerut. "
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, after some length of arguments, without pressing the matter on merits prayed for leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy available under the law, as advised.
3. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State-respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merits, but has not objected the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner for granting leave to withdraw the instant writ petition. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Tripathi, Surya Prakash Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Vanshu @ Vansh @ Vasu .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. Taking into consideration the submissions and prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and no objection made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents, leave granted.
5. Without entering into merits of the case, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. October 7, 2026 C. MANI CRLP No. 22823 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad