Allahabad High Court
A227/14201/2026 of SHAKEEL AHMAD Vs PREM PRAKASH AGRAWAL AND 9 OTHERS on 6 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14201 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This is a defendant's petition. In the suit filed by the plaintiff-respondent seeking permanent prohibitory injunction as well as for cancellation of the sale deed, an
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14201 of 2026
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This is a defendant's petition. In the suit filed by the plaintiff-respondent seeking permanent prohibitory injunction as well as for cancellation of the sale deed, an application for grant of temporary injunction was moved by the plaintiff, in which, ad- interim injunction has been granted and notices has been issued. The defendant has appeared in the said suit and filed his objection to the grant of ad-interim injunction, which is pending consideration. The prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the interim injunction application as well as the objection filed by defendant.
2. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to the respondents, at this admission stage, the court below is hereby directed to proceed with the application 6-C filed by the plaintiff along with the objection dated 20.01.2026 pending consideration in Original Suit No. 113 of 2025 filed by the defendant and decide the same within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties.
3. With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands disposed of.
4. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. October 7, 2026 A. V. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anuj Kumar Sharma, Santosh Kumar Singh, Syed Wajid Ali Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Shakeel Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) Prem Prakash Agrawal And 9 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad