Allahabad High Court
WPIL/2385/2026 of RAM AJOR Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS on 6 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2385 of 2026 Court No. - 51 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents State. Sri Azad Rai, Advocate, has accepted notice on behalf of Gaon Sabha. 2. The
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2385 of 2026
Court No. - 51
HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents State. Sri Azad Rai, Advocate, has accepted notice on behalf of Gaon Sabha.
2. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent nos.2 to 5 to remove the illegal encroachment made by encroachers over Plot No.21 area 0.0340 hectare, recorded as Panchayat Ghar in the revenue records, relating to Village Madipur, Tehsil Soraon, District Prayagraj.
3. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that petitioner has an alternative remedy to approach appropriate authority by moving an application under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, in view of the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Amaruddin Ansari Vs. State of U.P. and 5 others, passed in Public Interest Litigation (PIL) No.655 of 2026, decided on 18.03.2026, upholding the Coordinate Bench decision of this Court in the case of Kanhaiya Lal Vs. State of U.P. and others reported in 2023 (12) ADJ
226.
4. Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy, this Court is not inclined to entertain the instant petition.
5. In case, the petitioner moves an application under Section 67 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, before appropriate authority, the same shall Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kanak Kumar Tripathi, Raghvendra Mishra, Shivom Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. Ram Ajor .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
be decided after hearing all the concerned parties, in accordance with law.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. October 7, 2026 Anil WPIL No. 2385 of 2026 2 (Arun Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad