Allahabad High Court
WRIA/16311/2026 of AVINASH SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 5 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16311 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: " A writ order
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 16311 of 2026
Court No. - 33
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "A writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned order dated 14.09.2026 passed by the respondent no.2 (Annexure No. 1). A writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no.2 to decide the representation dated 25.09.2026 of the petitioner and further not to transfer the petitioner from District Jaunpur to District Farrukhabad on the post of Block Education Officer, during the educational session period of session 2026-2027."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is seeking quashing of the impugned order dated 14.09.2026 passed by the respondent no.2 by which the petitioner has been transferred to district Farrukhabad. In this regard, the petitioner has moved a representation/application which is pending consideration.
4. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending and it would be appropriate to direct the respondent no. 2 to decide the representation/application of the petitioner within a time frame as fixed by this Court. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek Bhushan, Manish Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Avinash Singh .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s)
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the aforementioned representation/application of the petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned provided that there is no other legal impediment. October 6, 2026 Ved Prakash WRIA No. 16311 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad