Allahabad High Court
A227/13410/2026 of RAJNIKANT RAI Vs SRI VANSHIDHAR (DEAD) AND 7 OTHERS on 5 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13410 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "i. direct the Civil Judge (Junior Division/F.T.C. No. 1), Ghazipur for expeditious disposal of Original Suit
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13410 of 2026
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "i. direct the Civil Judge (Junior Division/F.T.C. No. 1), Ghazipur for expeditious disposal of Original Suit No.52 of 1996 Vanshidhar (dead) and others Vs. Rajnikant Rai and others;"
2. It is contended that petitioner had filed Original Suit No.52 of 1996 before Civil Judge (Junior Division/F.T.C. No.1), Ghazipur which is pending consideration. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for the early disposal of the said suit.
3. Though the Division Bench of this Court in case of Ali Shad Usmani vs. Ali Isteba, 2015 (2) ADJ 250 (DB) had held that no separate class can be created amongst the litigants and no such direction can be issued for expeditious disposal of civil cases, but looking to the facts of the case, as the civil suit was filed way back in the year 1996 and almost 30 years have elapsed, the court below is hereby directed to expedite the proceedings of Original Suit No.52 of 1996 and proceed with the matter and decide the same, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties on day to day basis, preferably within a period of one year from the date of production of certified copy of this order, without granting any adjournment to either of the parties.
4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Tejas Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) :
Rajnikant Rai .....Petitioner(s) Sri Vanshidhar (Dead) And 7 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. October 6, 2026 SK Goswami A227 No. 13410 of 2026 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad