Allahabad High Court
NA529/4434/2026 of SARITA AND 3 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 5 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4434 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. 1. Heard Sri Sachin Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. 2. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4434 of 2026
Court No. - 82
HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Sachin Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record.
2. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the court concerned for early disposal of Case No. 910 of 2022 arising out of Case Crime No. 217 of 2021 (Dharmendra Kumar vs. Sarita and 3 others), under Section 306 I.P.C., Police Station- Barkhera, District- Pilibhit, pending before the ACJM, Court No.1, Pilibhit.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in the present matter final report has been submitted in favour of the applicant on 5.10.2022 and the trial court has registered the final report and vide order dated 2.12.2022 issued notice to the complaint to file objection. After about four years, on 18.3.2026 a protest petition has been filed on behalf of O.P. No.2, which is registered as Misc. Case No. 910 of 2022 and the same is still pending and considerable time has already been lapsed.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned to decide the aforesaid case in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order, without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to either of the parties, if there is no other legal impediment. October 6, 2026 KK Patel Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhay Pratap Singh, Sachin Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Sarita And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHN KANT PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad