Allahabad High Court
CRLP/21981/2026 of HATIM ALI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 5 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21981 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21981 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the First Information Report dated 07.08.2026 registered as Case Crime No. 179 of 2026, under Sections 65(1), 64(2)(m), 351(3), 89 of the BNS, 2023 and Sections 3, 4(2), 51, 6 of The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, Police Station Jaitpura, District Kashi (Commissionerate Varanasi).
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondent nos. 2 not to arrest the petitioner in pursuance of the First Information Report dated 07.08.2026 registered as Case Crime No. 179 of 2026, under Sections 65(1), 64(2)(m), 351(3), 89 of the BNS, 2023 and Sections 3, 4(2), 51, 6 of The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, Police Station Jaitpura, District Kashi (Commissionerate Varanasi)."
2. Learned A.G.A. has submitted that after completion of investigation, final report has been forwarded to the court concerned on 08.08.2026. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahesh Narayan Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Nitin Chandravanshi Hatim Ali .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in the light of the statement given by learned A.G.A.
4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr. Vijay Rathi, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State- respondents and perused the material on record.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that final report has already been forwarded, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication.
6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed. October 6, 2026 Saurabh CRLP No. 21981 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad