Allahabad High Court

A227/14045/2026 of AJEET KUMAR AND ANOTHER Vs SARVESH KUMAR AND 3 OTHERS on 5 October 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14045 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:- " a . Issue a suitable order or direction, directing the court concerned i.e. learned Civil Judge (Junior

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14045 of 2026

Court No. - 9

HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

1

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:- "a. Issue a suitable order or direction, directing the court concerned i.e. learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jaunpur to decide/dispose the Application 6C dated 06.12.2023 as well as the Original Suit No. 1673 of 2023 (Ajeet Kumar and Another vs. Sarvesh Kumar and Others) filed by the plaintiffs-petitioners, which are pending before the Court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jaunpur, expeditiously within a specified period to be fixed by this Hon'ble Court."

2. The prayer made in the writ petition, as far as disposal of Original Suit No.1673 of 2023, cannot be granted in view of Constitution Bench of Hon'ble Supreme Court in High Court Bar Association, Allahabad vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others (2024) 6 SCC 267.

3. However, as far as, prayer for deciding 6-C application is concerned, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or calling for counter affidavit, or issuing notice to private respondents, at this stage, and the writ is being disposed of requiring the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jaunpur to decide application 6-C filed in Original Suit No.1673 of 2023, in accordance with law, after hearing all the affected parties, preferably within a period of one months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anurag Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) :

Ajeet Kumar And Another .....Petitioner(s) Sarvesh Kumar And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. October 6, 2026 SK Goswami A227 No. 14045 of 2026 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead