Allahabad High Court
NA528/42847/2026 of JAVED AND 5 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 5 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 42847 of 2026 Court No. - 80 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Heard Sri Chandra Bhan, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Jyoti Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present application under Section 528
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 42847 of 2026
Court No. - 80
HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
3
Decisions referred to
In this index
3
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Chandra Bhan, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Jyoti Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
2. The present application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed with the prayer to quash the entire proceeding of Case No. 4657 of 2020 (State Vs. Javed and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 183 of 2012, under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station- Mahila Thana, District-Meerut, pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate/ Additional Civil Judge, IInd, Court No.2, Meerut.
3. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that applicants and opposite party no.2 have amicably settled their dispute out of the Court. Applicants approached this Court by filing Application U/S 482 No.43412 of 2024 with the prayer to quash the proceedings in terms of compromise entered between the parties and this Court vide order dated 20.03.2025 directed the parties to appear before the trial court for verification of the parties and compromise application. Trial court vide order dated 20.05.2025 verified the parties as well as compromise application. He further submitted that applicants and opposite party no.2 have settled their dispute through compromise and, as such, opposite party no.2 does not wish to press the aforesaid case against the applicants. Opposite party no.2 is ready to withdraw the prosecution of the applicants and in view of the compromise, no fruitful purpose would be served if the prosecution is allowed to go on. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chandra Bhan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Javed And 5 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
4. Learned A.G.A. submitted that both the parties have settled their dispute out of the court, hence, no reason to proceed further.
5. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Narindra Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Vs. State of Gujarat (2017) 9 SCC, 641, Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303 and State of M.P. Vs. Laxmi Narayanan (2019) 5 SCC 688, wherein Hon'ble Apex Court has categorically held that compromise can be made between the parties even in respect of certain cognizable and non-compoundable offences. Reference may also be made to the decision given by this Court in Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. and another [2013 (83) ACC 278], in which, law expounded by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the aforesaid cases has been explained in detail.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, as noted herein above, and also the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the considered opinion that no useful purpose would be served by prolonging the proceedings of the above mentioned case.
7. Accordingly, entire proceedings of the aforesaid case in respect of the applicants, are hereby quashed in terms of compromise.
8. This application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. is accordingly allowed. October 6, 2026 Rmk. NA528 No. 42847 of 2026 2 (Chawan Prakash,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad