Allahabad High Court

NA529/4271/2026 of SHEKHAR JAISWAL Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 5 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4271 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Learned counsel for the applicant orally submits that due to inadvertent mistake, "Session Trial" has wrongly been mentioned instead of "Criminal Case" in the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4271 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Learned counsel for the applicant orally submits that due to inadvertent mistake, "Session Trial" has wrongly been mentioned instead of "Criminal Case" in the prayer clause as well as in the memo of present application. He prays that he may be granted permission to correct the same. Prayer is accepted. Learned counsel for the applicant is granted permission to correct the same during the course of the day. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the court concerned to expedite the trial of Criminal Case No. 3014 of 2024 (State vs. Shekhar Jaiswal and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 485 of 2023, under Section 3 Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, Police Station Kotwali, District Ghazipur, pending before the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghazipur, expeditiously within stipulated period. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the trial has been pending since the year 2024. It is further submitted that, in compliance with the order passed by the coordinate Bench of this Court in Application U/S Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Singh Yadav, Rohit Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shekhar Jaiswal .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)

482 No. 11587 of 2024 (Shekhar Jaiswal v. State of U.P. and Another), the applicant moved a discharge application on 05.06.2024. Learned counsel further submits that final arguments on the said discharge application were concluded on 09.10.2025 and the matter was reserved for orders, however, till date, no order has been passed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned to decide the aforesaid criminal case and conclude the trial in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, within one year from the date of production of certified copy of this order, without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to either of the parties, if there is no other legal impediment. October 6, 2026 Brijesh NA529 No. 4271 of 2026 2 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead