Allahabad High Court
CRLP/10514/2025 of RAMESH Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 5 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10514 of 2025 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J. 1. Heard Mr. Siddharth Singh, the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned A.G.A. for State respondents 1 and 2. Even though, the name of Mr.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10514 of 2025
Court No. - 47
HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J.
HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. Siddharth Singh, the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned A.G.A. for State respondents 1 and 2. Even though, the name of Mr. Shobhit Yadav,, Advocate, is also published in the cause list as counsel for first informant, but neither he nor any one on his behalf is present to oppose present writ petition even in revised call.
2. Perused the record.
3. Petitioner-Ramesh has approached this Court by means of present Criminal Misc. Writ Petition challenging the FIR dated 26.04.2025 lodged by first informant-respondent-3, Mahendra Pratap and registered as Case Crime No. 121 of 2025, under Sections 85, 108, 115(2), 351(2) of B.N.S., Police Station-Rura, District-Kanpur Dehat.
4. On the matter being taken up, the learned counsel for petitioner fairly submits that that by the efflux of time, present writ petition has been rendered infructuous inasmuch as Investigating Officer upon completion of statutory investigation of aforemementioned case crime number in terms of Chapter XIII BNSS has submitted the charge sheet/police report and upon which cognizance has been taken. Accordingly, petitioner has filed an application against above i.e. application under Section 528 BNSS No. 29899 of 2026 (Ramesh Chandra Vs. State of U.P. and another). He, therefore, submits that in view of above, this writ petition be dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
5. Learned A.G.A. for State-respondents 1 and 2 has no objection to the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Siddharth Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Shobhit Yadav, G.A. Ramesh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
aforesaid prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioner.
6. In view of above, this writ petition is hereby dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
7. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
October 6, 2026 Imtiyaz CRLP No. 10514 of 2025 2 (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.) Digitally signed by :- IMTIYAZ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad