Allahabad High Court
WRIC/40330/2026 of SMT. ANARKALI AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 5 OTHERS on 5 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 40330 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 40330 of 2026
Court No. - 1
HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioners have prayed for a writ of mandamus commanding the police authorities not to dispossess the petitioners from the land in dispute at the instance of the private respondents.
3. It is submitted that the petitioners have already filed a civil suit for a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction and, while the temporary injunction application is pending consideration before the trial court, the respondents are interfering with the possession of the petitioners with the help of local police. It is submitted that in the suit, notices have been issued and the defendants have deliberately not put in an appearance.
4. In the given facts and circumstances of the case, we dispose of this petition with a direction to the trial court to ensure disposal of the temporary injunction application within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after recording its satisfaction regarding service of notice upon the defendants in the suit. However, we clarify at this stage that the local police and the civil administration Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bharat Singh Pal, Kshitij Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Anarkali And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
will not interfere in the civil dispute between the private parties, unless and until the law and order situation so demands. October 6, 2026 Lbm/- WRIC No. 40330 of 2026 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAL BAHADUR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad