Allahabad High Court
A227/14029/2026 of SURESH AND 4 OTHERS Vs VIKRAM on 5 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14029 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This is a plaintiffs' petition. In the suit filed by plaintiff, an application for grant of temporary injunction was moved, which was allowed by the trial Court. 2. According
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14029 of 2026
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This is a plaintiffs' petition. In the suit filed by plaintiff, an application for grant of temporary injunction was moved, which was allowed by the trial Court.
2. According to petitioners, defendants-respondents have violated the temporary injunction order, which led to filing of application under Order XXXIX, Rule 2A C.P.C., which has been registered as Misc. Application No.48 of 2017. The said application is pending consideration. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the said application.
3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon Civil Judge (Junior Division), Paschimi, Ballia to decide the Misc. Application No.48 of 2017, in accordance with law, after hearing all the affected parties, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
4. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. October 6, 2026 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Shukla, Siblu Panday Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Suresh And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) Vikram .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad