Allahabad High Court
WRIC/40299/2026 of COMMITTE OF MANAGEMENT SUDDITI GLOBAL ACADEMY Vs UNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS on 5 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 40299 of 2026 Court No. - 38 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J. 1. Heard Shri Prabhakar Awasthi, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Shri Alok Tiwari, Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent nos.2 to 4 and learned Standing Counsel
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 40299 of 2026
Court No. - 38
HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Shri Prabhakar Awasthi, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Shri Alok Tiwari, Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent nos.2 to 4 and learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents. No one has appeared on behalf of Union of India in spite of notice being served.
2. At the out set, learned counsel for the respondents has pointed out that the petitioner has preferred an appeal under Chapter-13.10 of the Affiliation Bye-laws-2018 of the Central Board of Secondary Education; and, pointing out from para-22, that the petitioner had tried to mislead this Court by stating that he has only sent a letter to the authorities concerned for reconsidering the order dated 14.09.2026.
3. Having confronted with the aforesaid scenario, learned Senior Counsel submits that he is ready to deposit a cost of Rs.25,000/- however, he may be permitted to file a fresh writ petition.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that even otherwise the writ petition shall not be maintainable.
5. However, in these peculiar facts and circumstances and that the learned Senior Counsel has fairly admitted the inadvertence, this Court is of the opinion that let the petitioner deposit a cost of Rs.25,000/- as suggested by the learned Senior Counsel; and in case he does so within a period of 7 days from today, he shall be at liberty to file a fresh writ petition; Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Kumar Ojha, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Alok Tiwari Committe Of Management Sudditi Global Academy .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
however the same shall be subject to the objection of maintainability by the respondents.
6. Under the circumstances, in view of the liberty as prayed, the writ petition is dismissed with the cost of Rs. 25,000/- to be deposited in the account of High Court Legal Services Committee.
7. Office shall ensure that if the cost is not paid, steps be taken to recover the amount aforementioned as arrears of land revenue. However, this order would not effect the liberty of the petitioner of filing a fresh petition.
8. Let a copy of this order be sent to the High Court Legal Services Committee. October 6, 2026 S.Prakash WRIC No. 40299 of 2026 2 (Siddharth Nandan,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad