Allahabad High Court

WRIA/9781/2026 of ANKIT KUMAR Vs STATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS on 5 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 9781 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. This petition has been filed for the following relief: "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authorities for re-measurement (Physical

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - A No. - 9781 of 2026

Court No. - 33

HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This petition has been filed for the following relief: "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authorities for re-measurement (Physical Standard Test) of the Petitioner through digital Machine and manual way, in presence of three senior Doctors (member) Committee and allow for the physical efficiency test, within stipulated period fixed by the Hon'ble this Court.

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing to the respondent no.2 to decide the representation dated 18.06.2026 of the petitioner dated 18.06.2026 of the petitioner within stipulated period fix by this Hon'ble court."

2. It was contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that height of the petitioner was wrongly mentioned by the respondent authorities. Height of the petitioner is 168 cm whereas the respondent authorities has measured the height of the petitioner to be 167.5 cm.

3. Considering the facts of the case, this Court vide order dated 20th July, 2026 directed the C.M.O., Allahabad to get the height of the petitioner remeasured by the penal of doctors.

4. In compliance of the said order, the height was measured of the petitioner and the report has been submitted by the learned Standing Counsel. The same is taken on record.

5. On the basis of the report submitted by the CMO, the learned Standing Counsel has submitted the height of the petitioner came to be 167.5 cm, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sharad Chand Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ankit Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)

which is less than cut off.

6. In view of theses facts, no relief can be granted.

7. The writ petition is dismissed. October 6, 2026 Kumar Manish WRIA No. 9781 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANISH TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead