Central Government Industrial Tribunal

EPF matters order dated 11.09.2025 CGIT- 2 Delhi on 11 September 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, DELHI

D-2/13/2025

M/s Sona Koyo Steering System Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Gurugram.

Present: Sh. Gaurav Kumar, Sh. S.K. Gupta, Sh. Yajat Kumar (AR), Sh. Raj Kumar, Sh. Harshit Verma from H.L. Kumar and Associates for the Appellant. Sh. Chakradhar Panda, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent.

**Order dated-11.09.2025**

Respondent seeks time for filing of reply stating that the fact of the appeal is complex in nature. In the interest of justice prayer to grant more time is allowed. Put up for filing of reply of the appeal on 08.10.2025.

22/9/25

**808(14)2016**

**M/s Viraj Exports vs. APFC Noida.**

Present: Sh. Rajiv Arora, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. Narender Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent.

**Order dated-11.09.2025**

Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that his father is not well and seeks adjournment. Let it be listed to final argument on 08.10.2025.

Atul Kumar Garg President

Place in file A

**D-2/32/2019**

**M/s Viraj Exports vs. APFC Noida.**

Present: Sh. Rajiv Arora, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. Narender Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent.

**Order dated-11.09.2025**

Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that his father is not well and seeks adjournment. Let it be listed to final argument on 08.10.2025.

![A green rectangular stamp or mark on the right side of the page, containing some faint text that is difficult to read.](a90ba8aacc324a0aea520405f644756a_7_img.webp)

*A* 23/09/25

**D-2/27/2022**

**M/s IL & FS Engineering & Construction Company Ltd. vs. RPFC, Gurugram**

Present: Sh. S.K. Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. None for the Respondent.

**Order dated-11.09.2025**

Record perused. On 12.11.2024 this court had noticed about the stay granted by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi against the order passed by this tribunal on 29.08.2022, wherein this tribunal while disposing off the application u/s 70 had directed the appellant to deposit the 25% of the assessed amount. The order dated 29.08.2022 passed by this tribunal was stayed by the High Court on 04.11.2022 and the matter is still pending.

Irrespective of the fact about the stay, no stay was granted on furtherance of proceedings in the appeal filed before this tribunal. Hence, this tribunal vide order dated 12.11.2024 had directed the respondent to file the reply of the appeal.

Considering the fact that stay had been granted on the order dated 29.08.2022 which does not affect the merit of the case, respondent has filed the reply of the appeal. Appellant is directed to file rejoinder within four weeks with direction to supply copy of the same to the respondent. Thereafter, matter be listed for final argument on 04.11.2025.

*order be communicated by email*

DA

*A*

**D-2/29/2022**

**M/s IL & FS Engineering & Construction Company Ltd. vs. RPFC, Gurugram**

Present: Sh. S.K. Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. None for the Respondent.

**Order dated-11.09.2025**

Record perused. On 12.11.2024 this court had noticed about the stay granted by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi against the order passed by this tribunal on 29.08.2022, wherein this tribunal while disposing off the application u/s 7O had directed the appellant to deposit the 25% of the assessed amount. The order dated 29.08.2022 passed by this tribunal was stayed by the High Court on 04.11.2022 and the matter is still pending.

Irrespective of the fact about the stay, no stay was granted on furtherance of proceedings in the appeal filed before this tribunal. Hence, this tribunal vide order dated 12.11.2024 had directed the respondent to file the reply of the appeal.

Considering the fact that stay had been granted on the order dated 29.08.2022 which does not affect the merit of the case, respondent has filed the reply of the appeal. Appellant is directed to file rejoinder within four weeks with direction to supply copy of the same to the respondent. Thereafter, matter be listed for final argument on 04.11.2025.

*order be communicated through email*

DA

*Q*

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead