Allahabad High Court

NA529/4430/2026 of JYOTI GUPTA Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 5 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4430 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. 2. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4430 of 2026

Court No. - 82

HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record.

2. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the court concerned for early disposal of Case No. 3583 of 2024 (State Vs. Ramesh Singh Rana and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 0003 of 2024, under Sections- 406, 419, 420 I.P.C., Police Station- Bhadohi , District- Bhadohi, pending before the court of C.J.M., Bhadohi-Gyanpur .

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is informant of the case and she is lady. After submission of the charge sheet, the trial court has taken the cognizance of the offence on 26.02.2024 and since then trial of the case is pending and a considerable time has already been lapsed. Order sheet annexed along with the instant application shows that accused persons are not appearing before the trial court and on several dates matter has been adjourned on one pretext or another.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned to decide the aforesaid case in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of one and half years from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order, without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to either of the parties, if there is no other legal impediment. October 6, 2026 KK Patel Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Parvesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Jyoti Gupta .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHN KANT PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead