Allahabad High Court
CRLP/22733/2026 of MAINA AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 5 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22733 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ order in the nature of certiorari quashing the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22733 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ order in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 08.06.2026, bearing case crime No. 157 of 2026, Under section 191 (old 147 I.P.C), 115 (2) (old 323 I.P.C), 352 (old 504 I.P.C), 326(g) (old 436 I.P.C) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita-2023, registered at police station- SiddharthNagar, District- SiddharthNagar, against the petitioners.
(ii) Issue a writ order/ direction in the nature of suitable mandamus directing the respondent No.2 not to arrest/ harass the petitioners pursuant to impugned F.I.R. dated 08.06.2026, bearing case crime No. 157 of 2026, Under section- 191 (old 147 I.P.C), 115 (2) (old 323 I.P.C), 352 (old 504 I.P.C), 326 (g) (old 436 I.P.C) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita-2023, registered at police station- SiddharthNagar, District- SiddharthNagar, against the petitioners."
2. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of State-respondents has submitted that after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been forwarded to the court concerned on 22.09.2026 qua petitioner nos. 1 and 3, whereas, the petitioner no. 2 has been exonerated. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vipin Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Babu Lal Ram, G.A., Gyanendra Kumar Maina And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in the light of the statement given by learned A.G.A.
4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, Mr. S.K. Ojha, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State- respondents, Mr. Babu Lal Ram, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 and perused the material on record.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that charge-sheet has already been forwarded, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication.
6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed. October 6, 2026 Saurabh CRLP No. 22733 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad