Allahabad High Court
CRLP/21990/2026 of RANI DEVI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 5 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21990 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. List of fresh cases has been revised. 2. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the instant writ petition whereas learned AGA appearing
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21990 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. List of fresh cases has been revised.
2. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the instant writ petition whereas learned AGA appearing for the State-respondents is present.
3. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "i). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus commanding the respondent nos. 2 and 3 to consider the petitioner's written complaint dated 05.09.2026 and register an first information report against respondent no.4 in accordance with law and conduct a fair, impartial, effective and time-bound investigation and to take suitable legal action against the respondent no.4 within stipulated period fixed by this Hon'ble Court. ii). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent authorities to ensure the life, liberty, safety and security of the petitioner and her minor children and to ensure that respondent no.4 does not threaten, intimidate or harass the petitioner."
4. Learned AGA appearing for the State-respondents submitted and apprised the Court that first information report has already been registered on 20.09.2026 but none appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lal Mani Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Rani Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. Taking into consideration the statement given by the learned AGA and also taking into account the non-appearance of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Court is of the view that the prayer as made by the petitioner in the instant writ petition has already been satisfied, therefore, the instant writ petition has become infructuous.
6. Accordingly, the instant merit petition is dismissed as infructuous. October 6, 2026 Prajapati RK CRLP No. 21990 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAMKESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad