Allahabad High Court

NA529/4428/2026 of SAVITA Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS on 5 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4428 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. 2. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4428 of 2026

Court No. - 82

HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record.

2. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the court concerned for early disposal of Complaint Case No. 18498 of 2024 (Savita Vs. Devendra and others), under Sections- 498-A, 323 I.P.C. & 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station- Nawabganj, District- Farrukhabad, pending before the court of Civil Judge (J.D.)/ Judicial Magistrate, F.T.C.-2 (Crime against women), Farrukhabad.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in the present matter, after considering the material available on record and the statements recorded under Sections 200 and 202 Cr.P.C., the learned trial court, vide order dated 08.05.2013, summoned O.P. Nos. 2 to 6 to face trial. Against the said summoning order, O.P. Nos. 3 to 6 approached this Court by filing Criminal Misc. Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. No. 18906 of 2013. Initially interim protection was granted in their favour but subsequently, they surrendered before the learned trial court on 17.05.2022. However, till date, the trial has not been concluded. The statement of the applicant as P.W.-1 was recorded on 04.09.2024 but the same could not be concluded due to the non-cooperation of O.P. Nos. 2 to

6.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this application is finally Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vimal Chandra, Virendra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Savita .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Opposite Party(s)

disposed of with a direction to the court concerned to decide the aforesaid case in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of one year from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order, without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to either of the parties, if there is no other legal impediment. October 6, 2026 KK Patel NA529 No. 4428 of 2026 2 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHN KANT PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead