Allahabad High Court
CRLP/24485/2025 of ANSAR AHMAD Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 5 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 24485 of 2025 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J. 1. Case called out in the revised list. 2. Heard Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for state respondents
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 24485 of 2025
Court No. - 47
HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J.
HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Case called out in the revised list.
2. Heard Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for state respondents 1,2 and 3.
3. Perused the record.
4. Petitioner - Ansar Ahmad has approached this Court by means of the present writ petition, challenging the impugned FIR dated 23.7.2025, lodged by first informant respondent 4, S.I. Kajal Kaushal and registered as Case Crime No. 223 of 2023 under Sections 3/5/8 U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, Police Station Sheeshgarh, District Bareilly.
5. On the matter being taken up, the learned counsel for petitioner submits that during pendency of present writ petition, Investigating Officer, upon completion of statutory investigation of aforesaid Case Crime Number has submitted the charge sheet under Section 193(3) BNSS.
6. On the above premise, the learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner does not want to press the present writ petition any further. Learned AGA representing state respondents 1, 2, 3, has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner. In view of above, the writ petition shall stand dismissed as not pressed.
7. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. October 6, 2026 safi Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Singh, Syed Wajid Ali Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.) Ansar Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAHBOOB SAFI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad