Allahabad High Court
CRLP/22735/2026 of MULAYAM SINGH YADAV Vs STATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS on 5 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22735 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22735 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari, quashing the impugned F.I.R. lodged by Respondent No. 4 against the Petitioner in Case Crime No. 142 of 2025 under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 333, 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the BNS., which was registered on 09.04.2025 at Police Station Civil Lines, District Rampur. (Annexure No.1 to this writ petition).
(ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents not to arrest the Petitioner in Case Crime No. 142 of 2025 under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 333, 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the BNS., which was registered on 09.04.2025 at Police Station Civil Lines, District Rampur."
2. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of State-respondents has submitted that after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been forwarded on 25.04.2025 before the court concerned.
3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in the light of the statement given by learned A.G.A. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alka Upadhyay, Yogesh Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Mulayam Singh Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. Heard Ms. Alka Upadhyay, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. Rizwan Ahmed, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State-respondents and perused the material on record.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that charge-sheet has already been forwarded, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication.
6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed. October 6, 2026 Saurabh CRLP No. 22735 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad