Allahabad High Court
CRLP/23324/2026 of RASHIM SHARMA Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHER on 4 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23324 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "(i). issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23324 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "(i). issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of certiorari to quash the impugned first information report being Crime No.334 of 2026, under Sections 132, 352, 351(2) of BNS, Police Station- Sector-20 Noida, District Gautambudh Nagar.
(ii) . issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the police to not to arrest the petitioner in the present matter."
2. Learned AGA appearing for the State-respondents submitted and apprised the Court that after completion of the statutory investigation, the Investigating Officer has submitted charge sheet on 18.08.2026 and the same was also forwarded to the court concerned.
3. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted and prayed that in view of the statement given by the learned AGA, the instant writ petition may be disposed of.
4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K.P. Pathak, learned AGA appearing for the State-respondents.
5. Taking into consideration the statement given by the learned AGA, the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the fact that after investigation, the Investigating Officer has submitted the charge sheet on 18.08.2026 and the same was also forwarded to the court Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Yatharth Nath Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Rashim Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Other .....Respondent(s)
concerned, therefore, we do not find any reason to keep the matter pending for further adjudication.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. October 5, 2026 Prajapati RK CRLP No. 23324 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAMKESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad