Allahabad High Court

CRLP/23324/2026 of RASHIM SHARMA Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHER on 4 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23324 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "(i). issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23324 of 2026

Court No. - 48

HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.

HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "(i). issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of certiorari to quash the impugned first information report being Crime No.334 of 2026, under Sections 132, 352, 351(2) of BNS, Police Station- Sector-20 Noida, District Gautambudh Nagar.

(ii) . issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the police to not to arrest the petitioner in the present matter."

2. Learned AGA appearing for the State-respondents submitted and apprised the Court that after completion of the statutory investigation, the Investigating Officer has submitted charge sheet on 18.08.2026 and the same was also forwarded to the court concerned.

3. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted and prayed that in view of the statement given by the learned AGA, the instant writ petition may be disposed of.

4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K.P. Pathak, learned AGA appearing for the State-respondents.

5. Taking into consideration the statement given by the learned AGA, the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the fact that after investigation, the Investigating Officer has submitted the charge sheet on 18.08.2026 and the same was also forwarded to the court Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Yatharth Nath Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Rashim Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Other .....Respondent(s)

concerned, therefore, we do not find any reason to keep the matter pending for further adjudication.

6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. October 5, 2026 Prajapati RK CRLP No. 23324 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAMKESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead