Allahabad High Court
A227/10536/2026 of VARUN KUMAR Vs RAMAVATAR AND ANOTHER on 4 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 10536 of 2026 Court No. - 35 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. In Re: Civil Misc. Amendment Application No. 3 of 2026:- Heard Sri Akhil Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Yash Tandon, learned counsel for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 10536 of 2026 Court No. - 35 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. In Re: Civil Misc. Amendment Application No. 3 of 2026:- Heard Sri Akhil Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Yash Tandon, learned counsel for the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to amend the prayer clause in the petition and also the prayer clause in the stay application. Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that though he has filed objections to the amendment application, however, he does not wish to press the same. Application is allowed. Necessary amendments be incorporated during course of the day. Order on Petition:- Present petition has been filed to set aside the order dated 06.08.2026 (Annexure No. 1) passed by the In-charge District Judge, Jalaun at Orai, in Rent Appeal No. 07 of 2025 (Varun Kumar Vs. Amit Kumar and another) and also to direct the District Judge, Jalaun at Orai, to decide Rent Appeal No. 07 of 2025, expeditiously on merits, uninfluenced by the observations made in the orders dated 05.05.2026/06.08.2026, and to restore the protection/stay available to the petitioner pending disposal of the said appeal. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhil Srivastava, Gopal Khare Counsel for Respondent(s) : Yash Tandon Varun Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Ramavatar And Another .....Respondent(s)
Learned counsel for the respondents has pointed out that, subsequent to the order dated 06.08.2026 passed in Rent Appeal No. 07 of 2025, whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner-tenant was rejected and the order dated 27.06.2025 passed in Rent Case No. 845 of 2024 was affirmed, possession of the premises in question has been handed over by the petitioner-tenant to the respondent-landlords. Counsel for the petitioner has not disputed the aforesaid developments, and that as a consequence thereof, he states that no cause of action survives in the matter. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. October 5, 2026 Sushma A227 No. 10536 of 2026 2 (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUSHAMA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad