Allahabad High Court

CRLP/22510/2026 of MAYA DEVI SAHU AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 4 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22510 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a Writ, order, or direction in the nature of certiorari to

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22510 of 2026

Court No. - 48

HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.

HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a Writ, order, or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned F.I.R. dated 03.05.2025 pertaining to Case Crime No. 0112 of 2025 under section 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC at police station Barra, district Kanpur Nagar, lodged by respondent no.4 against the petitioner. (Annexure no.1).

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.2 & 3 not to arrest the petitioners in connection F.I.R. Dated 03.05.2025 pertaining to Case Crime No. 0112 of 2025 under section 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC at police station Barra, district Kanpur Nagar."

2. Learned A.G.A. has submitted, upon completion of the investigation, final report was forwarded to the court concerned on 29.09.2025. Thereafter, an order for further investigation was passed. Pursuant thereto, further investigation was conducted, and upon its completion, the final report dated 29.09.2025 was finalized on 16.09.2026.

3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Mishra, Satyam Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Maya Devi Sahu And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

petitioners submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in the light of the statement given by learned A.G.A.

4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, and Mr. S.N. Tiwari, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State-respondents and perused the material on record.

5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that final report has already been forwarded, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication.

6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of. October 5, 2026 Saurabh CRLP No. 22510 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead