Allahabad High Court
NA528/41183/2026 of SOMPAL Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 4 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 41183 of 2026 Court No. - 80 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Heard Sri Ram Sajiwan, Advocate holding brief of Sri Anjani Kumar Shahwal, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. This application
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 41183 of 2026
Court No. - 80
HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Ram Sajiwan, Advocate holding brief of Sri Anjani Kumar Shahwal, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
2. This application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the applicant with the prayer to allow this application and quash the charge- sheet dated 08.02.2023 as well as cognizance/summoning order dated 01.04.2025 and entire proceedings of Case No. 2912 of 2025 (State Versus Sompal), arising out of Case Crime No. 256 of 2022, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 507, I.P.C. and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station- Ijjat Nagar, District- Bareilly, pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bareilly.
3. After advancing certain argument at length by learned counsel for the applicant, when the Court put certain query to him, he gave up his challenge to the aforesaid impugned charge sheet against the applicant and confined his submission requesting to grant some protection to the applicant to surrender before the concerned court. Learned counsel for the applicant further stated at the Bar that he is not pressing any other prayer made in this application on merits and prayed that a direction may be issued to the concerned court to consider and decide the bail application of the applicant, expeditiously in accordance with law.
4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. for the State states that he has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant for not Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anjani Kumar Shahwal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sompal .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
pressing the other prayers made in the instant application.
5. In view of the above, it is directed that in case the applicant appears before the concerned trial court within two weeks from today and applies for bail, the bail application shall be considered and decided in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another: (2021) 10 SCC
773. Till the aforesaid period of two weeks or till appear before the Court, whichever is earlier, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case.
6. With the aforesaid observations, this application is finally disposed of. October 5, 2026 Rmk. NA528 No. 41183 of 2026 2
(Chawan Prakash,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad