Allahabad High Court
CRLP/22519/2026 of KIRSHANA MALAN Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS on 4 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22519 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed with the prayer to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22519 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present writ petition has been filed with the prayer to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no.2 to make sure the fair investigation in Case Crime No.0469 of 2026 under Sections 109 (1), 351 (3) of BNS, Police Station - Khair, District - Aligarh by respondent no.3 or transfer to another investigating agency for the sake of justice.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State and perused the material on record.
3. It is submitted by learned AGA that in the instant matter, after completion of investigation, final report has been forwarded on 11.08.2026 before the concerned Court.
4. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in light of the statement given by the learned A.G.A.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that final report has already been submitted, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication.
6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of.
October 5, 2026 C. MANI Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Radhe Shyam Rajbhar, Virpratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Kirshana Malan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad