Allahabad High Court

CRLP/22519/2026 of KIRSHANA MALAN Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS on 4 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22519 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed with the prayer to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22519 of 2026

Court No. - 48

HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.

HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present writ petition has been filed with the prayer to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no.2 to make sure the fair investigation in Case Crime No.0469 of 2026 under Sections 109 (1), 351 (3) of BNS, Police Station - Khair, District - Aligarh by respondent no.3 or transfer to another investigating agency for the sake of justice.

2. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State and perused the material on record.

3. It is submitted by learned AGA that in the instant matter, after completion of investigation, final report has been forwarded on 11.08.2026 before the concerned Court.

4. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in light of the statement given by the learned A.G.A.

5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that final report has already been submitted, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication.

6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of.

October 5, 2026 C. MANI Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Radhe Shyam Rajbhar, Virpratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Kirshana Malan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead