Allahabad High Court

NA529/5263/2026 of SMT. SAPNA Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 4 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 5263 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. 2. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 5263 of 2026

Court No. - 82

HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record.

2. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the court concerned to decide the Execution Case No. 985 of 2024 in Maintenance Case No. 97 of 2022 ( Smt. Sapna vs. Pushpendra ), under Section 144(3) BNSS (corresponding Section 125(3) Cr.P.C.), Police Station Magorra, District Mathura pending before the court of Principal Family Judge, Mathura, within stipulated period.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that on 30.9.2024 an application under Section 144(3) BNSS has been filed, which is still pending i.e. for last more than two years.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned to decide the said application, keeping in view the provisions provided under Section 125(3) Cr.P.C./144(3) BNSS as well as procedures and Rules, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to the parties, if there is no other legal impediment. October 5, 2026 KK Patel Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manoj Mishra, Shashank Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Smt. Sapna .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHN KANT PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead