Allahabad High Court

CRLP/23294/2026 of KIRAN DEVI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 4 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23294 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue any writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23294 of 2026

Court No. - 48

HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.

HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue any writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent nos.2 & 3 to conclude the investigation of Case Crime No. 200 of 2026 (State vs. Shivam Bind and Ors) under Section 191 (2), 115 (2), 352, 351 (2), 109 (1) of BNS, P.S.-Sujanganj, District-Jaunpur pursuant to the impugned FIR dated 09.06.2026 and submit progress report before this Court within stipulated period of time.

2. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of State-respondents has submitted that after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been forwarded on 02.08.2026 before the court concerned.

3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in the light of the statement given by learned A.G.A. with liberty to avail appropriate remedy available, under the law.

4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. S.N. Tiwari, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State-respondents and perused the material on record.

5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that charge-sheet has already been forwarded, we Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nadeem Ahmad, Nirbhay Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Kiran Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)

do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication.

6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed with liberty as prayed for. October 5, 2026 C. MANI CRLP No. 23294 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead