Allahabad High Court
CRLP/23294/2026 of KIRAN DEVI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 4 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23294 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue any writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23294 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue any writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent nos.2 & 3 to conclude the investigation of Case Crime No. 200 of 2026 (State vs. Shivam Bind and Ors) under Section 191 (2), 115 (2), 352, 351 (2), 109 (1) of BNS, P.S.-Sujanganj, District-Jaunpur pursuant to the impugned FIR dated 09.06.2026 and submit progress report before this Court within stipulated period of time.
2. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of State-respondents has submitted that after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been forwarded on 02.08.2026 before the court concerned.
3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in the light of the statement given by learned A.G.A. with liberty to avail appropriate remedy available, under the law.
4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. S.N. Tiwari, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State-respondents and perused the material on record.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that charge-sheet has already been forwarded, we Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nadeem Ahmad, Nirbhay Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Kiran Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication.
6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed with liberty as prayed for. October 5, 2026 C. MANI CRLP No. 23294 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad