Allahabad High Court
CRLP/24112/2026 of TINKU AND 5 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 4 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 24112 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following main reliefs:- "I. To issue a writ, order or direction in the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 24112 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following main reliefs:- "I. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned First Information Report dated 15.08.2026 registered as Case Crime No. 198 of 2026, Under Sections 190, 191(2), 331(4), 309, 74, 115(2), 351(3) of B.N.S., Police Station Gunnaur, District Sambhal.
II. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the concerned Respondent not to arrest the Petitioners in pursuance to the First Information Report dated 15.08.2026 registered as Case Crime No. 198 of 2026, Under Sections 190, 191(2), 331(4), 309, 74, 115(2), 351(3) of B.N.S., Police Station Gunnaur, District Sambhal."
2. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State submitted that the investigation has been completed and charge-sheet has also been forwarded on 18.09.2026 to the court concerned.
3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted and prayed that in the light of the statement given by learned AGA for the State the instant writ petition may be disposed of.
4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, Mr. S.K. Ojha, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State and perused the material available on record.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State as well as prayer made by Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kailash Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Tinku And 5 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, we do not find any reason to keep this matter pending for further adjudication.
6. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed. October 5, 2026 Vikram CRLP No. 24112 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad