Allahabad High Court
WRIC/40146/2026 of TOYAJ KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS on 4 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 40146 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard Sri Kripa Shankar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri A.C.Srivastava, learned counsel for respondent no. 2. 2. By means of this petition filed under
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 40146 of 2026
Court No. - 1
HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Kripa Shankar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri A.C.Srivastava, learned counsel for respondent no. 2.
2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution petitioner has prayed for disposal of his pending application for re-issuance of passport with the concerned Regional Passport Officer.
3. Per contra it is submitted by learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioner has been issued with the show cause notice to explain about the following criminal case which is pending against him:
(i) Case crime no. 103 of 2023, under Section 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Lalapur, District Prayagraj.
4. In our considered view, petitioner should, in the first instance, follow the guidelines and procedures laid down in the judgment of this Court in the case of Rahimuddin vs. Union of India & Another (Neutral Citation No. – 2025:AHC:181505-DB) and recently in the case of Wajiruddin Khan v. Union of India & 2 Others, (Neutral Citation No. – 2026:AHC:138176-DB) and thereafter, the Regional Passport Officer shall dispose of the application of the petitioner in accordance with guidelines laid down in the aforesaid judgments.
5. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this petition stands disposed of. October 5, 2026 Sanjeev Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kripa Shankar Tiwari, Shivani Chaudhary Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Avinash Chandra Srivastava, C.S.C. (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Toyaj Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANJEEV RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SANJEEV RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad