Allahabad High Court
CRLP/23322/2026 of HIMANSHU YADAV @ HIMANSHU AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 4 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23322 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a statement at bar that the petitioners have been arrested and sent to jail,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23322 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a statement at bar that the petitioners have been arrested and sent to jail, therefore, the relief prayed in the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
2. Learned AGA does not dispute the aforesaid facts.
3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. October 5, 2026 Prajapati RK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahendra Kumar Maurya, Radhey Shyam Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Himanshu Yadav @ Himanshu And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAMKESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad