Allahabad High Court
WRIA/16286/2026 of YOGENDRA YADAV Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 4 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16286 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. This petition has been filed for the following relief:- " a . Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 to ensure the transfer of the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 16286 of 2026
Court No. - 33
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This petition has been filed for the following relief:- "a. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 to ensure the transfer of the petitioner from District Jalaun to Varanasi region Varanasi on the compassionate basis.
b. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent по. 2 to decide the representation dated 22.07.2026 and 02.08.2026 (Appended as Annexure No. 5 & 6 to the petition) within a period specified by this Hon'ble Court."
2. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that as petitioner has already represented, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending and it would be appropriate that respondent No. 2 be directed to consider the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law.
3. In view of these facts, respondent No. 2 is directed to consider and decide the representations dated 22.07.2026 and 02.08.2026 of the petitioner in accordance with law, after providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
4. It is made clear that this court has not examined the matter on merits and the order shall be passed strictly in accordance with law.
5. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. October 5, 2026 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Kumar, Vinod Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Yogendra Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad