Allahabad High Court

NA529/5271/2026 of SMT PRIYANKA AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 4 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 5271 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. 2. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 5271 of 2026

Court No. - 82

HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record.

2. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the court concerned for early decision of Case No. 903/2024 (Priyanka Vs. Bharat), under Sections- 144 BNSS Police Station- Dankaur, District- Gautam Buddha Nagar.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the the matter is pending before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Gautam Buddh Nagar, since 04.10.2024. The applicant no.1 is the wife and applicant no.2 is minor child of opposite party no.2. The trial has pending since 2024 and considerable time has already been lapsed but nothing has been done.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned to decide the aforesaid case in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to either of the parties, preferably within a period of six months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order, if there is no other legal impediment. October 5, 2026 S.K. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashok Kumar Chaubey, Parth Chaubey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Smt Priyanka And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SWEETY KANOJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead