Allahabad High Court
WRIC/13437/2026 of SMT. OMWATI Vs UNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS on 4 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 13437 of 2026 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 3. The petitioner being
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 13437 of 2026
Court No. - 40
HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
3. The petitioner being aggrieved by the order dated 30.03.2025 passed by the respondent no.3 has approached this Court.
4. In the impugned order, the respondent no.3 has recorded a finding that he shall decide the matter only after the dispute between the parties with respect to disputed land pending before the Board of Revenue is decided.
5. Now, it has been informed that the Board of Revenue has decided the dispute between the parties with regard to disputed land by order dated 17.09.2026, copy of which is annexed with the supplementary affidavit filed today.
6. In such view of the fact, the ground on which the District Magistrate has deferred the matter is no more in existence. Accordingly, we quash the impugned order dated 30.03.2025 Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Madhur Prakash, Ramesh Prasad Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C., Manoj Kumar Singh, Puneet Agarwal, Santosh Kumar Singh Smt. Omwati .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
passed by the respondent no.3 and direct the District Magistrate, Ghaziabad to decide the claim of petitioner afresh in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of filing of certified copy of this order after hearing all the concerned parties.
7. For the reasons given above, the writ petition is allowed with no order as to costs. October 5, 2026 Sattyarth WRIC No. 13437 of 2026 2 (Siddharth Nandan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad