Allahabad High Court

WPIL/2356/2026 of SHIVLAL Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2356 of 2026 Court No. - 51 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following relief:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2356 of 2026

Court No. - 51

HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following relief:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent authorities particularly respondent no.3/Tehsildar, Tehsil- Gyanpur, Bhadohi to remove the illegal encroachment made by private respondents over Araji No. 17 measuring area 0.1770 hectare, Araji No. 21 area 0.5060 hectare and Araji No. 36 area 0.617 hectare of Village-Kaliyapur @ Puredalthamman, Tehsil-Gyanpur, District-Bhadohi and also made within reason and stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court."

2. Perusal of the averments made in the writ petition and documents annexed with it shows that a report was submitted on an IGRS complaint by the Deputy District Magistrate, Gyanpur, Bhadohi on 7.2.2025, which shows that in respect of Plot Nos.21 and 36, Original Suit Nos. 948 of 2018, 942 of 2018, 949 of 2018, 941 of 2018 and 943 of 2018 are pending before the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bhadohi in which interim injunction of status quo is operating and that no constructions are being raised in Plot Nos.17, 21 and 36. The said report has been reiterated on an another IGRS complaint dated 14.6.2026 annexed as Annexure-4 to the writ petition.

3. In view of the aforesaid, as there is already an order of interim injunction operating in respect of the plots in question, no direction for eviction or demolition can be issued by this Court in the present PIL. The grievance of the petitioner can be redressed only after the aforesaid suits Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Yadav, Sanjay Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pradeep Singh Shivlal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s)

are decided, in accordance with law.

4. The present writ petition being misconceived is, accordingly, dismissed. October 1, 2026 Anil WPIL No. 2356 of 2026 2 (Arun Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead