Allahabad High Court
BAIL/35133/2026 of HARICHARAN YADAV Vs STATE OF U.P. on 30 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35133 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Heard Sri Praveen Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the accused- applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present bail application has been moved by the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35133 of 2026
Court No. - 69
HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Praveen Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the accused- applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The present bail application has been moved by the accused-applicant- Haricharan Yadav to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 71 of 2026, under Sections 3/5A/8 Cow Slaughter Act and 11 Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, P.S.- Kandva, District- Chandauli, during the pendency of trial.
3. It is contended by learned counsel for the accused-applicant that the police has initiated the provisions of Cow Slaughter and Animal Cruelty Act against the accused-applicant and co-accused in F.I.R. dated 28.08.2026 with the allegation that accused persons were carrying three cattle for slaughtering. The arrest and recovery has been made in the absence of independent witness. The charge sheet is submitted. The applicant has no criminal history. The applicant is in jail since 28.08.2026 and hence, the applicant seeks to be released on bail.
4. Learned A.G.A. for State has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant, but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.
5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
6. Considered that the arrest and recovery has been made in the absence Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Raja Ram Pal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Haricharan Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
of independent witness.
7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685].
9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. October 1, 2026 Krishna* BAIL No. 35133 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad