Allahabad High Court
WRIB/4421/2026 of SAROJA YADAV AND ANOTHER Vs BOARD OF REVENUE U.P. AT ALLAHABAD AND 4 OTHERS on 30 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 4421 of 2026 Court No. - 51 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents State and Sri Prem Bahadur Singh, holding brief of Sri Rameshwar Prasad Shukla for the Gaon Sabha. 2. The present
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - B No. - 4421 of 2026
Court No. - 51
HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents State and Sri Prem Bahadur Singh, holding brief of Sri Rameshwar Prasad Shukla for the Gaon Sabha.
2. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent no.1 to decide Revision No.1061 of 2026, under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within a time framed as fixed by this Court.
3. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the revision filed by respondent no.5 is barred by time and he has no locus to maintain the said revision. He states that a suitable direction may be issued to get the revision decided, expeditiously.
4. On a specific query being made by the Court that whether any objection has been filed by the petitioners, who are the contesting respondents in the said revision regarding its maintainability and locus of the respondent no.5, he stated that no such objection has been filed till date. Despite the fact that the petitioners themselves have not been vigilant in pursing the matter before the respondent no.1, they have approached this Court for expediting the proceedings of the aforesaid revision. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Chandra Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rameshwar Prasad Shukla Saroja Yadav And Another .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue U.P. At Allahabad And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. In view of the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is misconceived and is, accordingly, dismissed. October 1, 2026 Anil WRIB No. 4421 of 2026 2 (Arun Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad