BAIL/34186/2026 of SATYAM SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. on 30 September 2026

1. Heard Sri Mohit Singh, learned counsel for accused applicant, Sri Rupesh Kumar, learned counsel holding brief appeared for the informant and learned A.G.A. for State.

2. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant/ accused- Satyam Singh to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 53 of 2026, under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 352, 118(2) BNS, P.S.- Industrial Area, District- Prayagraj, during the pendency of trial.

3. It is the contention of learned counsel for applicant that the accused applicant has been implicated in the FIR dated 20.04.2026 lodged by Varunendra Pratap Singh (the brother of injured/ Samendra Pratap Singh), who has been assaulted by the accused/applicant and his father as well as brother on 19.04.2026 and thereafter. It is alleged in the FIR that the accused/applicant and injured are resident of same lodge and pursuing their studies, the accused/applicant is B-Tech student whereas the injured is B-Pharma student. There was some altercation between them, which led to the assault and cross fight. There are 11 injuries suffered by the injured and the accused/applicant has suffered 6 injuries. The FIR of injured has been lodged but in cross the FIR of accused/applicant has not been registered by the police. Learned counsel further submits that his mother has moved an application under Section 173(4) BNSS, which was later on converted to a complaint. It is the contention of learned counsel that the accused/applicant is not habitual offender and it was merely Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Faizan Siddiqui, Mohit Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Rajesh Kumar Satyam Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)

because of sudden quarrel that both the parties had entered into free fight. It is further contended that brother and father of the accused/applicant has already been granted bail by this Court. The investigation is continuing and he is cooperating with the investigation. The accused/applicant has no criminal history. The accused applicant is languishing in jail since 29.08.2026. He seeks to be enlarged on bail.

4. Learned A.G.A. for State and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for bail and submit that there is grievous injuries on the person of injured, which are 11 as is shown in the medico legal examination report. Further submits that the injured is a student and there are grievous injuries on his person. Hence seeks that the bail application be rejected.

5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

6. Considering the sudden quarrel between the parties, which led to the cross fight between them, wherein both the parties have moved a criminal proceedings against each other, the accused/applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.

8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685].

9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. October 1, 2026 Abhishek Sri. BAIL No. 34186 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK RANJAN SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad