Allahabad High Court
WRIC/39899/2026 of MUNNILAL AND 4 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 30 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 39899 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing to the respondent concern to decide the the M.A.C.P.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 39899 of 2026
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing to the respondent concern to decide the the M.A.C.P. No.447 of 2019 (Munnilal and others VS. Udairaj and others), pending in the Court of respondent No.2 expeditiously within some stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that Motor Accident Claims Petition is pending consideration since 2019 before Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gorakhpur.
3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, or calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to the private respondents, the matter is being disposed of, at the admission stage, with a direction upon court concerned to decide the pending M.A.C.P. No.447 of 2019 (Munnilal and others Vs. Udairaj and others) after hearing all the concerned parties, strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
4. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merits. October 1, 2026 A. V. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Munnilal And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad