Allahabad High Court
BAIL/35170/2026 of AZIM ANSARI Vs STATE OF U.P. on 30 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35170 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Heard Sri Harendra Yadav, learned counsel for accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant accused- Azim
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35170 of 2026
Court No. - 69
HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Harendra Yadav, learned counsel for accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant accused- Azim Ansari to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 46 of 2025, under Sections 318(4), 317(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) of BNS and Section 66D of IT Act, P.S.- Cyber Crime, District- Varanasi during the pendency of trial.
3. It is the contention of learned counsel for accused applicant that the FIR has been lodged on 8.12.2025 by Sri Madan Mishra informant with the allegation that his account with Central Bank has been hacked by some anonymous persons and Rs.42,50,000 has been siphoned off from his account. It is further contended that the accused applicant has been apprehended along with other co-accused and there is recovery of a brand new Brezza Car from the applicant, which is stated to be purchased by the money, which was siphoned off. It is further contended that except the disclosure statement, there is nothing incriminating against the accused applicant whose name has been figured out from the statement of co- accused. The investigation is continuing. The applicant has three cases criminal history, wherein, in two cases, he is on bail and in one case, he has been acquitted. The applicant is languishing in jail since 13.9.2026. He seeks enlargement of accused on bail.
4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail application. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Harendra Yadav, Shivam Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Azim Ansari .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
6. Considering that the name of the accused applicant has been figured out from the statement of the co-accused and except the disclosure statement, there is nothing incriminating against the accused applicant, the accused applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.
7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685].
9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. October 1, 2026 Krishna* BAIL No. 35170 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad