Allahabad High Court

A227/13881/2026 of SRI MANMOHAN GUPTA Vs SRI BALAJI ACTION MEDICAL INSTITUTE AND 2 OTHERS on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13881 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "I. Issue an appropriate order or direction commanding Respondent No.1, U.P. State Consumer Disputes

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13881 of 2026

Court No. - 9

HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "I. Issue an appropriate order or direction commanding Respondent No.1, U.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Lucknow, to decide the Appeal No. A/1304/2023, on merits and finally decide the aforesaid appeal expeditiously, within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court, without granting unnecessary adjournments to either party, subject to reasonable opportunity of hearing to all concerned."

2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that against the order of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, an appeal has been preferred before State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Lucknow, which is pending consideration.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that said Appeal No. A/1304/2023 be decided expeditiously.

4. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon respondent no. 1 to decide the Appeal No. A/1304/2023, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

5. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Harsh Vardhan Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) :

Sri Manmohan Gupta .....Petitioner(s) Sri Balaji Action Medical Institute And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)

6. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. October 1, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) A227 No. 13881 of 2026 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead