Allahabad High Court
WRIC/39837/2026 of SMT. OMKARI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 30 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 39837 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Instructions filed today be kept on record. 2. From the record, we find that out of plot no. 877, 0.0384 hectares were acquired. This comes to 384 square meters. Where
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 39837 of 2026
Court No. - 29
HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Instructions filed today be kept on record.
2. From the record, we find that out of plot no. 877, 0.0384 hectares were acquired. This comes to 384 square meters. Where exactly this plot is situated is not discernible.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that when he had moved some applications for compensation etc. it was held by the prescribed authority i.e. the Additional District Magistsrate (F&R), Muzaffarnagar that, in fact, the plot no. 877/2 (new no. 1504) has never been acquired.
4. If that is the case, the petitioner who claims to be the owner of plot no. 877/2 may get his plot demarcated and get it separated from the remaining land of plot no. 877.
5. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. October 1, 2026 PK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Atul Kumar Srivastava, Richa Shukla, Rishabh Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Smt. Omkari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad