Allahabad High Court

A227/13830/2026 of SUKHVINDAR SINGH Vs NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13830 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "i) direct the court of learned District Judge, Kanpur Dehat to decide the Arbitration Case No.7 of 2023

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13830 of 2026

Court No. - 9

HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "i) direct the court of learned District Judge, Kanpur Dehat to decide the Arbitration Case No.7 of 2023 (NHAI Vs. Sukhvindar Singh and others) (Old Misc. Case No. 124/2022 - NHAI Vs. Sukhvindar Singh and others) pending since 05.08.2022 within a stipulated/fixed period of time as directed by this Hon'ble Court."

2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that an application under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed which is pending before District Judge, Kanpur, registered as Arbitration Case No.7 of 2023. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the same.

3. Section 34(6) of the Act of 1996 provides for the period for deciding the application filed under the Act.

4. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon court concerned to decide the Arbitration Case No.7 of 2023 (NHAI Vs. Sukhvindar Singh and others) (Old Misc. Case No. 124/2022 - NHAI Vs. Sukhvindar Singh and others), complying the provisions of Section 34(6) of the Act of 1996, after hearing all the affected parties.

5. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dinesh Kumar Singh Sukhvindar Singh .....Petitioner(s) National Highway Authority Of India And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)

6. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. October 1, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) A227 No. 13830 of 2026 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead